>From the legal code, Section 4(a): "You must include a copy of, or the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) for, this License with every copy of the Work You Distribute or Publicly Perform". [1]
And also... "You may not sublicense the Work". So, a CC-BY-SA work is not sub-licensable as required by the terms of use of FB. [1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode Vicenç > From: odder.w...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:12:39 +0200 > To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] CC-BY on Facebook > > Hi Matthew, > I'd take the freedom to disagree with you; as far as I know, the CC > BY-SA licence (version 3.0, but also all the previous ones) does not > require linking to its text (at > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>), not to mention > pasting the whole text. > > The only requirement is to attribute the author in the way specified > by him/her, and in our case most of the time this means to mention the > name of the author and the name of the licence. But taking into > consideration Facebook's Terms of Use, it would obviously be safer to > link to the licence, agreed. > > On the other side, I would really like to see a legal case against > Facebook, because it really seems weird if they could get a > "non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide" > licence for all content that is uploaded to their servers, especially > if they could overrule a free licence like CC BY-SA simply by having > such a phrase in their Terms of Use. > > -- > Tomasz W. Kozłowski > a.k.a. [[user:odder]] > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org