Dear Mahmoud and Stephen,

Thank you very much for solving this problem! My dashboard looks much better now.

best,
Alexander


On 9/18/2020 7:53 AM, Mahmoud Hashemi wrote:
Hey again Alexander (and everyone),

Pleased to report that all the code that's fit to publish is now pushed to the Montage production site: https://montage.toolforge.org/#/

This release includes admin performance improvements and the Archive feature. We've also done a one-time cleanup and archived all campaigns with close dates before 2020. For any others, click into a campaign page and click "Archive Campaign" at the top. Unarchiving is included, free of charge. :)

Thanks for your patience, and to all coordinators, keep up the good work!

Mahmoud & Stephen

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:30 AM Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Dear Mahmoud,

    Thank you for your prompt response. As far as I can see here:
    https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169
    Alexey did everything he could do at this stage, and it is your
    turn now.

    best,
    Alexander


    On 9/3/2020 2:24 AM, Mahmoud Hashemi wrote:
    Yeah, I think we're waiting on responses from Alexey Baturin on
    those PRs. Is he on this list?

    On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:22 PM Alexander Tsirlin
    <altsir...@gmail.com <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Dear Lodewijk,

        As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you
        start a separate thread on that, and would like to leave
this to the maintainers to respond to.
        I am asking because we fail to get any response at github
        since more than a month, and I would like to reach also those
        members of the international team who are not checking github
        regularly. Before we export something from Montage, we should
        make sure that it does not fail upon import.

        - Alexander



        On 9/3/2020 12:56 AM, effe iets anders wrote:
        Hi Alexander,

        As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you
        start a separate thread on that, and would like to leave
        this to the maintainers to respond to.

        As for publishing the settings: I was imagining some kind of
        log-style publication, not a near write-up. This won't be
        pretty, but it will allow people to figure out how it worked
        out in practice. If we follow a logical naming convention,
        people should be able to puzzle it together. Ideally, the
        national organizers also publish their process on the
        website, but this log would be a way to verify that. But I
        accept your note that we may need to add a context
        explaining that more process may happen before/after this
        tool is used.

        Lodewijk

        On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:17 PM Alexander Tsirlin
        <altsir...@gmail.com <mailto:altsir...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            Dear Lodewijk,

            We also intend to publish by default the settings of
            the montage jury tool, and the number of photos in each
            round that the national competitions have used. We're
debating whether there should be an opt-out for this year.
            This is unrealistic, because jury process may involve
            several campaigns that are later merged together (in
            Russia, we do it all the time in order to meet your
            submission deadline). Moreover, some of the photos can
            be accepted for the next round within Montage but
            excluded later on if we find that they do not depict
            cultural heritage. The end result is that any number you
            take from Montage will not match the number of photos
            that we publish (e.g., as a short-list). This will only
            lead to confusion and won't be of any use for anyone.

            Since you mentioned Montage, let me also ask when two
            important pull requests, which were done by one of our
            team members, are going to be merged into the code:
            https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169
            https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/175
            These are really, really important fixes. Without them I
            would have a problem creating new Montage campaigns in
            October.

            Sincerely,
            Alexander


        _______________________________________________
        Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
        WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
        <mailto:WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org>
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
        http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org


    _______________________________________________
    Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
    WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org  
<mailto:WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
    http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

    _______________________________________________
    Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
    WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
    <mailto:WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
    http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org


_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

Reply via email to