On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:58:58 -0700, James Hawkins wrote: > The imports for current dlls concerning advapi32 are fine; no need to > change to delay import. I understand where you're going with moving > factoring out registration, it's just that advapi32 is not the place. > I'm not sure where else you could put this. I would ask Alexandre > whether he wants it done at all, and if so, where the new code should > be located.
I believe this was discussed when the registration code was first added, and Alexandre preferred this approach to having some utility DLL. I guess it's a matter of taste. I would have preferred a wineutils.dll or somesuch but he is the boss :) thanks -mike