On Tuesday 26 September 2006 22:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well thats at least a reasoned response, even if I don't agree with the > > reasoning. But again you simply miss the point. I don't care that > > Alexandre doesn't move my patches (because its not true that he doesn't) > > and since I now have a patch management capability which allows me to > > manage my local tree and keep in sync with wineHQ. But wine is my/our toy > > now as well as Alexandre's and I for one want to make it better. > > > > In that Alexandre and I should be in agreement and perhaps he should > > consider some of the positive measures I have suggested. > > To be honest, I have no idea what it is that you are suggesting. All I > see is phrases like "community focused process" or "acceptance policy" > which frankly are just meaningless buzzwords. If you expect anything > to happen, you'll need to make much more concrete suggestions, and > provide examples to make us understand how what you are suggesting > would work in practice, and how it would be different from what we are > doing now.
Pleased to, I'll put my explanations along with suggestions into a material form and present them here in a new thread. Bob
