Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Another thing is that "pdh.dll" is not by default present on NT4 and
below so the tests have to be changed to cope with that as
well. Should I have a go at that?
It may be a good idea to add generic support for that in
winetest. It's a bit silly to have to manually fix all the tests
that use new dlls.
And how would you do that?
The first thing that winetest does is go through all the tests to retrieve all
the subtests. If it finds a missing dll (or depending dll) we could/should catch
that and not run the tests.
Is it as simple as that?
Cheers,
Paul.
