Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 12:34 PM, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>> Stefan Dösinger schreef: >>>> What do we do if there's a d3dx9_37.dll next month? >>>> >>> One thing that comes to mind is: git-mv d3dx9_36 d3dx9_37 and create a >>> forward dll for the old one. >> Renames are "cheap" in git and we do not loose the history. > I also think that rename is not a good idea. Heh. I didn't say that i don't like renames. I said renames are a workable solution: read there's no technical reason why to not use them.
> I would like propose a new idea, why dont we have different spec files > inside wine_d3dx for all different versions of dlls. > Its something like we have done it in the ole32. > But, it requires some makefile/configure cruft. There's no need to name that wine_d3dx. Nothing stops us to name it d3d9x and have all the other versions generated inside that. bye michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 Sr. Network Engineer Fax.: +49-711-96437-111