On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:43 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810 > > > --- Comment #4 from Erich Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-10 18:43:16 --- > This whole DLL has a total of 27 functions, 14 of which are currently exposed, > and only 1 is "implemented". I put some work into implementing enough of the > DLL to get RA3 to authenticate and found that it needs 9 of the functions to > operate properly. I think it is reasonable to say that implementing the rest > of the functions for WinHttp would not be too difficult. I do not think that > this particular issue is anywhere close to a broad-spectrum "Win32 API needs > to > be implemented". >
Of course it's not the same scale as all of the Win32 API. It was an analogy illustrating why the bug is superfluous. On the other hand, you're vastly underestimating the amount of work needed to properly implement winhttp. You might want to chat with Zac Brown who is working on implementing winhttp right now. Also, please don't post in closed bugs. -- James Hawkins
