Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Zachary Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Policy is that all patches should be independent, no? > > There is no such a policy. Dependent patches are marked as > 1/xx, 2/xx, ... xx/xx.
That's a patch series, and patchwatcher handles that ok. There's another kind of dependent patch, where somebody says "This requires Harold's patch from yesterday". Patchwatcher probably isn't going to handle that ever.
