Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Paul Bryan Roberts" <pbronline-w...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> I guess this stub falls in to the 'not obviously correct' category. >> >> I could do with some feedback on what might be an acceptable patch. > > It appears that GetNamedSecurityInfoExA signature doesn't match > the MSDN/PSDK one. Also it's a common practice to simultaneously > add both A and W versions, and add prototypes to an appropriate > .h file. > Ah, right you are, thanks.
I guess that should have read 'most obviously incorrect'. I cannot find any reference to GetNamedSecurityInfoEx with or without the A or W on http://www.msdn.microsoft.com. I have looked several times over the last six months or so. Is there another MSDN somewhere ? GetSecurityInfoExW and (there is no stub for) GetSecurityInfoExA have prototypes in include/aclapi.h. Would that be an appropriate .h to add prototypes for GetNamedSecurityInfoExA and GetNamedSecurityInfoExW to ? If you would like I could add a stub for GetSecurityInfoExA too. One patch or two ?
