On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote: > The problem with the current arrangement is that when machines pop in and > out, any failures that are more likely on those machines also pop in and > out, so error counts fluctuate, which obscures the smaller changes due to > wine fixes or regressions. > I like the current output, and don't want to change it; I just want to add > another view for people who want to judge progress. > > Setting up a view with a fixed set of machines would do, too. Which is > easier?
FWIW, Paul's windows machines and my test results for Wine (32 bit and 64 bit) should be pretty stable. You'd probably want to remove the BSD/Solaris runs though. -- -Austin