>Why should there be multiple support forums? Well, not forums, but as I said different lists for different kinds of applications(games/business/graphics), since they should(?) have related problems. I would think so, anyway.
>The wiki has _a lot_ of info, most of the time when bugs are closed invalid, >wiki links are given to fix the problem. Again, wine _is_ an open source >project. > If the wiki isn't good enough, add something. I am talking about avoiding a bug being submitted at all. Maybe to organize how-to-run information. Sure I could do a bit of that. It's like the idea you had about getting funding, did they tell you to go do it all by yourself? >How do you mean their priorities are important? It's an uncomfortable >truth, but users priorities aren't important, like has been said >dozens of times. Sure, we care about user's bugs, and want to fix >them. ... Users priorities probably affect what severity level they choose. But as I said to Ken, I can't believe that all users are morons. Anyway, regardless of their motives, I still think that they have to be included. If not, the project will slowly drift away and turn into a toy nobody have any use for. >But every user also thinks *their* app is the most important >application to fix. Actually, I can't believe they all are that way. When I first posted a bug here on bugzilla some time ago, one of the first thing I got was you telling me that "there are other applications just as important as yours". The reason in my case was that I completely misunderstood the severity instructions (I had the flu so I was a bit hazy) and mixed it up with the priority instructions. I got going on your comment that Photoshop was not more critical than any other application, which I a far cry from getting pissed of about something with really few users. >Wine can't stop development on _everything_ just to get one user's >application running. Making user's arbitrary priorities the most >important would be doing this. Good thing I didn't propose that then. :-) I said it should be a part of the priority and a considerable one. Not the largest one. And I am not talking about users arbitrary priorities, just including more intuitive severity levels(good or bad) when making bug fixing priorities. //Nicklas
