Henri Verbeet <hverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ideally all regressions would be bisected, but that's clearly not the > case. You can of course argue about terminology and / or mechanism, > but I think it's useful to distinguish "possible" regressions from > confirmed regressions with a commit id. Personally I think it would be > nice if bugzilla could give me a list of commit id's and associated > bugs, so I could use git and some scripting to do additional > processing on that.
Probably it would be better to add a field for commit id that caused a regression just like there is one for url/keywords instead of inventing new keywords. So a 'regression' with a commit id would automatically mean 'bisected'. That would also save time of finding the commit id by looking at every comment in the bug, and possibly avoiding finding incorrect bisect results. -- Dmitry.
