On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesin...@gmx.at> wrote: > On Thursday 30 June 2011 21:50:45 Michael Mc Donnell wrote: >> I have another question about my test. I've basically copied all the >> test data from my ConvertAdjacencyToPointReps test, and then just >> inverted the conditions. Should I merge the two tests, put the test >> data in a separate function, or just ignore the duplication? > IMO keeping the tests separated and as simple as possible is more important > than avoiding code duplication here, but I don't think we have a policy about > this.
Ok, I'll keep what I have for now.
