On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 13:38, Erich E. Hoover <ehoo...@mines.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Marvin <test...@testbot.winehq.org> wrote: >> ... >> === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit sock) === >> sock.c:509: Test failed: oob_server (1ac): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 >> sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (1ac): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 > > Is this an expected failure?
The OOB failure happens randomly because there are time related issues in the tests. We should only send one byte packages and wait for them, that would work in windows and wine. The main problem related to oob is that unix implementation differs from windows. > Also, if you're unfamiliar with the > gethostbyname() code then the place where you would want to change > this is in WS_create_he(). Thanks, I noticed that while studying the code. As soon as the tests get in I will start working in a solution, I know you have more experience with that code and I wouldn't oppose if you would like to work in it, just tell me. > If the behavior is opposite on OSes > earlier than XP then you may wish to have it behave differently > depending on the Windows version. Once I was told that wine should behave only as newer systems to avoid if(os==x) dothis else dothat. I'll see what I can do. > Erich Hoover > ehoo...@mines.edu Best wishes, Bruno
