On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Per Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Ken Thomases <k...@codeweavers.com> wrote: >> --- > > This has probably been discussed before, but shouldn't snprintfW be > safe against this kind of thing, the way POSIX snprintf is?
I actually checked the man page for snprintf() when I originally wrote that code, which is why I assumed snprintfW() would terminate it. So, my vote is for "yes". :) -Ken
