Piotr Caban <piotr.ca...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do. > > ... > >> msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX > >> dlls when native msvcp90 is installed. > > > > Isn't that the case for other msvcp* dlls? > > > As far as I remember msvcp90.dll is the only one. > > On the other hand there are other benefits of preferring builtin dlls > over native ones. Thanks to it the dll is tested by more users. Because > there are no reported bugs related to msvcr90 I would prefer to use > builtin dll in this case as well (actually there's one bug but it's > abandoned).
What's the point in treating only msvcp90 specially and leaving all other msvcp* dlls prefer native versions? At least for consistency sake. -- Dmitry.