There are at least 3 more interfaces to be implemented, should I put them in richole.c as well?
2013/7/31 Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org>: > Caibin Chen <tigerso...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi Alexandre, >> >> I think it make sense to have a separate file for ITextDocument. It >> will be used in txtsrv.c and richole.c (See patch 4). If it's WINE's >> convention to not have separate files for separate implementations, I >> can merge the txtrng.[ch] and txtsel.[ch] that introduced in patch 2 >> and 3 into txtdoc.[ch] > > It's already defined and used in richole.c. If at some point it becomes > too large it can be moved to a different file, but introducing a new > file and then removing that stuff from richole.c makes a mess of the > history. > > -- > Alexandre Julliard > julli...@winehq.org
