On 23/05/2014 19:36, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Joe,
>
> I'll be traveling again and mostly out of email contact from tomorrow
> through June 3.  A couple of thoughts, before I leave:
>
> 1. Can we get a version of WSJT-X suitable for a beta release ready in
> the reasonably near future?  It doesn't need to be perfect.  For
> example, if there are still rig-control issues with a few specific rigs,
> we can let that be known.  There is so much good stuff in the current
> version, it's too bad that most users still have r3673 or earlier.
I am a little uneasy about this because there are major issues with rig 
control of Icom rigs via DX Labs Suite commander and the direct control 
of the FT-817/FT-857/FT-897 series is fundamentally flawed.

For the former I am waiting on Dave AA6YQ to hopefully make the TCP/IP 
more managable but I feel that he has lost interest in favour of other 
more pressing user facing issues for the Suite. I am reluctant to push 
him on this as he has helped a lot already.

For the Yaesu FT-8x7 series I am working through a complete rewrite of 
the Hamlib back end for them, it is going well but will take a bit 
longer to complete.

I suppose a beta/release candidate would be OK but I am wary of being 
flooded with a whole series of complaints about the rig interface not 
working where it appeared to work before.

As for making a release candidate, anyone who has NSIS installed and can 
build on Windows with CMake should be able to prepare an installer by 
using 'cmake --build <release-build-dir> --target package'.

The documentation needs some love around the the settings dialog area 
and the new waterfall features. If anyone wants to help with the docs on 
WSJT-X I am happy to help by explaining the subtleties of the new 
settings dialog.
>
> 2. Chase asked about the possibility of merging the documentation for
> WSPR and WSPR-X.  I'm not fundamentally opposed; but on the other hand
> WSPR-X is rather a step-child in some ways, ignored by most.  It's not
> clear that it has much of a near-term future, as the higher priorities
> all seem to be elsewhere.
>
> I do think, however, that we should re-do the WSPR documentation in the
> new, asciidoc-based way.
>
>       -- 73, Joe, K1JT
73
Bill
G4WJS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to