On 08/05/2015 15:01, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi all, Hi Joe, > > Thanks again for the quick responses. > > On 5/8/2015 9:50 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: >> If you included the wsjtx.rc file then the Icons take a fair bit of >> space. Also as others have said, if it is a debug configuration build it >> will be full of debug information. >> >> Try a release configuration build and install, that will remove all the >> debug symbols. > > I was comparing sizes for a Release build. The big difference was, > indeed, having included the stuff in wsjtx.rc. > > I had wondered, anyway, if there was any good reason to include that > file in the builds of the command-line executables jt9, jt9sim, > jt65code, jt9code, jt4code (as well as wsprd). Should it be omitted? It is nice to have the small icons at least so the binaries show up in file browser lists with the correct "branding", they are small in comparison to the bulk of the shipped content in the ICU and Qt libraries. There's no significant run rime cost to the icons.
I could build a smaller resources bundle for background executables. > > -- Joe 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
