On 27/07/2015 10:59, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
The real solution to this is a tri-state meaning of the flag for
this. Right now it's Boolean. So make it an int and -1,0,1 -- 0
and 1 have the current meaning, and -1 means don't activate (which is
the same as 0 for Tab 2 also).
Then the user can select the typical action they want from the
client. This really needs to be a user choice.
That is not a good solution as we have discussed in the past, the
problem with it is that it requires knowledge of which of tab one and
tab two is active.
I think I have a better solution, which I am testing right now, and I
will post something soon.
73
Mike W9MDB
73
Bill
G4WJS.
*From:*Laurie VK3AMA [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Monday, July 27, 2015 2:07 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [wsjt-devel] Request: UDP change to Free-Text command
I have a need for the UDP Free-Text command to NOT enable the "Next"
Radio Button on TAB1. Myself and several others often queue a message
into the future, not for the next minute.
As currently implemented the UDP Free-Text command ALWAYS enables that
radio button on TAB1 despite the setting of the "Send" boolean value.
On TAB2, the radio button activation obeys the "Send" flag. I know the
radio buttons behave differently on the Tabs and that the "Send" flag
may not be appropriate, but could be used as it is only used by Tab2.
Bottom-line, I need the ability set or not set the radio button when
sending free-text on Tab1.
Thanks.
de Laurie, VK3AMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
