Bill, thanks for your reply. I understand UI design is a hard problem and
I'm glad you're on it. It sure seems that WSJT-X has a solid technical core
to build around, which is a good thing.

*As always, finding the balance of developing a tool that makes digital *
*communication by amateur radio fun and requires traditional aspects of *
*operating skill to do it well without making an automated QSO server *
*that spoils the fun for everyone.*

Yes. On that point, I was a little surprised to see that "Call 1st" was
available as an option in RU contest mode.

*I wonder if anyone has reverted to the old fashioned dupe sheet *
*techniques using a pen and paper? *


 Back in the day, my memory was a lot better and I would work without a
dupe sheet until a break, when I would go back over the log and update it.
Now I'm totally spoiled with contest logging software...

73, Paul K6PO

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:52 AM Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
wrote:

> On 29/11/2018 04:47, Paul Kube wrote:
> > Is there any way to control colors of a non-CQ message? There doesn't
> > seem to be, and I would like to do that.
> >
> > For example:, I'd like to have a visual cue when someone not in the
> > log is finishing a QSO, so I know they're not a dupe and I can tailend
> > without waiting for their next CQ: highlight their "W1XYZ K0ABC 73"
> > message. (This came up a lot in this evening's mock contest.)
> >
> > Possible?
> >
> Hi Paul,
>
> not currently. Clearly applying decode colour highlighting to non-CQ
> messages is very desirable and it is on the to-do list but is not
> trivial to implement given the current code base. Also some sort of
> mechanism to highlight new multipliers, in contests like the ARRL RTTY
> RU where multipliers are not covered by the current decode highlighting
> facility, would be equally desirable for serious contest operators.
>
> For some background, as the speed of QSOs has increased and the number
> of decodes has increased with modes like FT8 on HF, it has become
> necessary for WSJT-X to do more and more interpretation of message
> content for it to be anything like satisfying and ergonomic to use. This
> has evolved organically on top a framework that was originally developed
> to just display the decoded messages and let he user make all the
> decisions about what to transmit next and what to log at the end of a
> QSO. Some fairly major internal reworking is desperately needed to make
> further implementation like this practical without introducing many new
> defects as a side-effect.
>
> As always, finding the balance of developing a tool that makes digital
> communication by amateur radio fun and requires traditional aspects of
> operating skill to do it well without making an automated QSO server
> that spoils the fun for everyone.
>
> I wonder if anyone has reverted to the old fashioned dupe sheet
> techniques using a pen and paper? I always used to use an A3 sheet
> divided into 26 boxes for each letter of the alphabet and enter worked
> calls indexed by the first letter of the end letters part of their
> callsign, e.g. my call G4WJS would be written into the 'W' square when
> worked. Another sheet was used for mults worked, ok until trying the WPX
> contest!
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to