But the original intent as was discussed on the ADIF list was that the SUBMODE
field was to allow new modes to be added there before the committee needed to
approve them. SUBMODE was to have a "suggested" enumeration.They changed the
meaning of it...because they named it incorrectly and somebody started
interpreting it as a propagation mode label.
Oh well....
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/adifdev/conversations/topics/6055
On Wednesday, July 31, 2019, 11:12:15 AM CDT, Bill Somerville
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 31/07/2019 16:58, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
> The ADIF committee apparently thinks all software is easy to change
> and should do so to match their intentions.
>
> We unsuccessfully fought this idea so you'll just have to live with
> what they've done.
>
> de Mike W9MDB
>
Mike,
the ADIF committee introduced the Submode enumeration back in ADIF
v3.0.4 released on 2013-08-04, that's nearly six years ago. Logging
programs that cannot export records with valid Submode values have had
plenty of time to update and stay conformant.
http://www.adif.org.uk/304/ADIF_304.htm
73
Bill
G4WJS.
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
