I must admit that I missed the part about the qso on .150 and focused on the
.174 part. I really could not answer your question aboutthe larger change in
frequency from .150 to .174. Sorry that I misunderstood. Perhaps the question
is best answered by someone whoknows more about the reporting to pskreporter.
73,
Andy, ka2uqw
On Saturday, December 24, 2022 at 02:39:01 AM EST, Saku via wsjt-devel
<[email protected]> wrote:
I just wonder...
We did qso on 144.150 (qsy by vfo knob). After qso I moved back to
144.174 that is saved to wsjtx/frequencies.
Because wsjtx sends heard calls to pskreporter as a "block" time to time
I think the sending happened after our qso when I was again back on 144.174
I just wonder did it catch frequency from that moment, not at time when
qso was held on 144.150
Note the difference frequencies, it is bigger than vfo +(-) audio
frequency can produce.
Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel kirjoitti 23.12.2022 klo 16.44:
> Saku,
>
> My experience has been that pskreporter displays the frequency as
> received by the receiving station. So, this would be display
> frequency plus the audio frequency used for the qso.
> Sometimes the two are not the same, for instance, your transmit
> frequency and that of the other station may differ. This is because
> of small differences in frequency of the rigs used during
> the qso. Also, on 144Mhz, some folks, like me, use a transverter to
> put them on 2 meters. My transverter is always a little off
> frequency. I've seen no difference in the reporting frequencies no matter
> the version of WSJT-X.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> 73,
> Andy, ka2uqw
--
Saku
OH1KH
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
