On 9/6/21 2:31 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 03/09/2021 20:06, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
This renames the `struct xsm_operations` to the shorter `struct xsm_ops` and
converts the global xsm_ops from being a pointer to an explicit instance. As
part of this conversion, it reworks the XSM modules init function to return
their xsm_ops struct which is copied in to the global xsm_ops instance.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>

Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>

However, some suggestions...

diff --git a/xen/xsm/xsm_core.c b/xen/xsm/xsm_core.c
index 55483292c5..859af3fe9a 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/xsm_core.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/xsm_core.c
@@ -28,9 +28,17 @@
  #include <asm/setup.h>
  #endif
-#define XSM_FRAMEWORK_VERSION "1.0.0"
+#define XSM_FRAMEWORK_VERSION    "1.0.1"
-struct xsm_operations *xsm_ops;
+struct xsm_ops __read_mostly xsm_ops;
+
+enum xsm_ops_state {
+    XSM_OPS_UNREGISTERED,
+    XSM_OPS_REG_FAILED,
+    XSM_OPS_REGISTERED,
+};
+
+static enum xsm_ops_state xsm_ops_registered = XSM_OPS_UNREGISTERED;

__read_mostly, or can this be __initdata ?

Apologies, I think you may have suggested this before. It would be good to be able to check this later but currently since I just introduced this and it is only used during init, it could be made __initdata for now and later if it gets exposed, then it can be moved to __read_mostly.

Do you agree?

@@ -87,25 +88,35 @@ static int __init xsm_core_init(const void *policy_buffer, 
size_t policy_size)
      }
  #endif
- if ( verify(&dummy_xsm_ops) )
+    if ( xsm_ops_registered != XSM_OPS_UNREGISTERED )
      {
-        printk(XENLOG_ERR "Could not verify dummy_xsm_ops structure\n");
+        printk(XENLOG_ERR
+               "Could not init XSM, xsm_ops register already attempted\n");
          return -EIO;
      }
- xsm_ops = &dummy_xsm_ops;
-
      switch ( xsm_bootparam )
      {
      case XSM_BOOTPARAM_DUMMY:
+        xsm_ops_registered = XSM_OPS_REGISTERED;
          break;
case XSM_BOOTPARAM_FLASK:
-        flask_init(policy_buffer, policy_size);
+        ops = flask_init(policy_buffer, policy_size);
+        if ( ops )
+        {
+            xsm_ops_registered = XSM_OPS_REGISTERED;
+            xsm_ops = *ops;
+        }
          break;
case XSM_BOOTPARAM_SILO:
-        silo_init();
+        ops = silo_init();
+        if ( ops )
+        {
+            xsm_ops_registered = XSM_OPS_REGISTERED;
+            xsm_ops = *ops;
+        }

This if ( ops ) block can be deduplicated by moving after the switch()
statement.  It's going to be common to all everything except dummy.

Good call. I will rework to remove the duplication.

v/r,
dps


Reply via email to