On 18/03/2019 13:11, Juergen Gross wrote: > Instead of freeing percpu areas during suspend and allocating them > again when resuming keep them. Only free an area in case a cpu didn't > come up again when resuming. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
Hmm - this is slightly problematic, given the dual nature of this code. I agree that it this change is beneficial for the suspend case, but it is a problem when we are parking an individual CPU for smt=0 or xen-hptool reasons. Do we have any hint we can use when taking the CPU down as to whether we're expecting it to come straight back up again? ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
