On 27/03/2019 16:55, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 18/03/2019 13:11, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Instead of freeing percpu areas during suspend and allocating them >> again when resuming keep them. Only free an area in case a cpu didn't >> come up again when resuming. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> > > Hmm - this is slightly problematic, given the dual nature of this code. > > I agree that it this change is beneficial for the suspend case, but it > is a problem when we are parking an individual CPU for smt=0 or > xen-hptool reasons. > > Do we have any hint we can use when taking the CPU down as to whether > we're expecting it to come straight back up again?
Did you look into the patch? I did this by testing system_state. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
