Hi, The title claim this is a resend, but this is actually not the latest version of this patch. Can you explain why you decided to use v1 rather than v2?
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 23:16, Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com> > > The end should be GICD_ISACTIVERN not GICD_ISACTIVER. > > (See https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=158527653730795 for a discussion on > what it would take to implement GICD_ISACTIVER/GICD_ICACTIVER properly.) > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@xilinx.com> > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> I don't think you can be at the same time an author of the patch and a reviewer. Otherwise, I could review my own patch ;). Cheers,
