On 15.12.2015 19:04, Thomas Klausner wrote: > Like this? [...]
> diff --git a/include/list.h b/include/list.h > index 39f1985..f41d418 100644 > --- a/include/list.h > +++ b/include/list.h > @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ xorg_list_is_empty(struct xorg_list *head) > * See xorg_list_for_each_entry for more details. > */ > #define xorg_list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, tmp, head, member) > \ > + pos = NULL; > \ > for (pos = __container_of((head)->next, pos, member), \ > tmp = __container_of(pos->member.next, pos, member); \ > &pos->member != (head); \ Yes, but the xorg_list_for_each_entry macro needs the same treatment. With that, Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
