I really like the look Mikael has created here.

A couple of related questions, this could just be mis-calibrated expectation from visual design on my part so please don't take them as criticism - merely an attempt to clarify:

1) where the visual design differentiates from the toolkit (Gtk+) is the intention that we should use the toolkit provided widgets or create our own to more closely match the visual design?
(for example the tabs for notebook pages in the 'Building Packages' screen).

2) When implementing Hob v1 I tried to follow the GNOME HIG[1] to ensure the app would fit in with the common Linux desktop environments. Should v2 continue that trend? Where the visual design might differ with the HIG which should be preferred? (i.e. the button being flush with the bottom of the window in the Image Configuration screen is what first struck me here).

3) where the visual design uses various colours I assume the intention is to use the colours from the operating systems theme? This is slightly more difficult programatically than hard-coding colours but leads to (in my opinion) a much more pleasing visual experience.
(i.e. tooltip and button colours)

Finally, I notice that the titlebar calls it HOB, instead of Hob - was that intentional? Hob was always mean as a name, not an acronym.

I'm probably confusing visual design for a spec but it's been a while since I worked with the design team and my engineers mind is very literal.

This is looking really good!

Cheers,
Joshua

1. http://developer.gnome.org/hig-book/3.0/

On 02/02/12 09:24, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
Mikael, our visual designer, has been working full speed on Hob 1.2. His
work is now in the wiki too:

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/File:Hob_1.2_screens_inventory.pdf


Belen

On 02/02/2012 16:58, "Barros Pena, Belen"<belen.barros.p...@intel.com>
wrote:

I've uploaded a document detailing the design of the Settings dialogue
for Hob 1.2 at

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/File:Settings-dialogue-design-spec-v1.0
.pdf

Sorry it's a boring document instead of a video: it seemed the only way
to provide the necessary level of detail

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Belen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

--
Joshua Lock
        Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
        Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to