On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: > Nominally it is to protect them from kernel headers changes and to not > require headers or a full tree to be present (or at least this is what > I've learned over the years, I may be forgetting other elements). >
but thats what linux-kernel-headers are now a days isnt it ? > In the past, I've also removed this duplication of kernel header files > as well, and it does work, but it does create a tighter binding to > toolchain or kernel sources. from OE's POV we can assume that we will always have kernel-headers so we could prefer them instead ? We are not interested in building it standalone but rather with some distro > > It is something that can be changed in the package, but as they say > "you end up with the pieces, if it breaks" :) > _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
