On 05/04/2012 09:35 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 09:24 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> >> On 05/03/2012 06:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On 12-05-03 09:50 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 08:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>>> On 12-05-02 11:35 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: >>>>>> From: Tom Zanussi<tom.zanu...@intel.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> This adds a few new features, one for xhci-hcd and another for >>>>>> amt/mei, and refactors some existing config options into a new >>>>>> echi-hcd, which is then used in crownbay. >>>>>> >>>>>> If this looks like the way to go, I'll add similar USB features >>>>>> for ohci and uhci and fix up all the meta-intel BSPs to use >>>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> I had a look, and while at first I thought it was perhaps an over >>>>> splitting and categorization. It does make things very clear, and >>>>> gets us a split that can be used to keep configs minimal and reusable. >>>>> >>>>> I also wasn't sure about directory splitting, since we do end up >>>>> with the names both in .scc/.cfg and the directory name. We could >>>>> flatten the directory down to just 'usb' and keep the names of the >>>>> files as the differentiator. And if we don't think we'll have to >>>>> carry any patches, we could put it under cfg/usb/<Tom's stuff>. >>>>> >>>>> I don't have a really strong opinion (but gave my preference) on this >>>>> split (several directories vs single), and I'd bet that you considered >>>>> the same thing. Comments ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> The directory splitting is definitely a result of personal preference on >>>> my part i.e. directories are cheap and I hate having bunches of files in >>>> a single directory. This is actually the reason I tend to >>>> avoid /cfg. ;-) >>> >>> Aha! A valid point :) >>> >>>> >>>> In this case and most others, I find the directory splitting maps more >>>> cleanly 'at-a-glance' for me to the split in functionality, but as I >>>> said it's a personal preference and if most people prefer a more >>>> flattened tree, then I don't have a problem making that change... >>> >>> Nope. I'd rather not have you re-do it for just that minor change, when >>> there's a valid reason on both sides. >>> >>> I tossed the email .. and something has happened to my IMAP connection, >>> so I can't find them now. Can you resend just the pull request ? or >>> just the patches to me. >>> >>> We can wait to see if Darren has a strong opinion one way or the other >>> as well. >> >> Personally I prefer to keep directories minimal until such time as there >> is a need for more. As it is we're only talking about a handful of files >> which are still easily filtered. Still, this isn't a huge deal. I care >> more about the granularity of the setup. I feel having the usb/base bit >> adds unnecessarily to the file count. >> > > OK, sounds like people like flat directories. > > Actually, the other option would be to just put the options into the > top-level feature like everything else. Was trying to clean that > current situation up a bit, but maybe it's not really needed and I'll > just continue with that, will have to think on it....
I think at least a usb/ dir is worth while. My rule of thumb is that a new dir needs at least 3 things (I'd group cfg and scc as 1 thing). Again, highly subjective. -- Darren > > Tom > >> Otherwise I'm content-ish. >> >> -- >> Darren >> >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> >>>>> But definitely, this is the way to go, just a minor question about the >>>>> organization of the files. >>>>> >>>>> Bruce >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.2. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Tom >>>>>> >>>>>> The following changes since commit >>>>>> b14a08f5c7b469a5077c10942f4e1aec171faa9d: >>>>>> Yang Shi (1): >>>>>> meta: Clean up BSPs kernel config >>>>>> >>>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>>> >>>>>> git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib.git >>>>>> tzanussi/xhcd-mei-features >>>>>> >>>>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi//log/?h=tzanussi/xhcd-mei-features >>>>>> >>>>>> Tom Zanussi (5): >>>>>> meta: add usb/host/base feature >>>>>> meta: add usb/xhci-hcd feature >>>>>> meta: add usb/ehci-hcd feature >>>>>> meta/crownbay: use ehci-hcd feature >>>>>> meta: add mei feature >>>>>> >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/crownbay/crownbay.cfg | 4 ---- >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/crownbay/crownbay.scc | 2 ++ >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg | 3 +++ >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.scc | 4 ++++ >>>>>> .../features/usb/ehci-hcd/ehci-hcd.cfg | 1 + >>>>>> .../features/usb/ehci-hcd/ehci-hcd.scc | 6 ++++++ >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/host/base.cfg | 3 +++ >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/host/base.scc | 4 ++++ >>>>>> .../features/usb/xhci-hcd/xhci-hcd.cfg | 1 + >>>>>> .../features/usb/xhci-hcd/xhci-hcd.scc | 6 ++++++ >>>>>> 10 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>>> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.cfg >>>>>> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/amt/mei/mei.scc >>>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/ehci-hcd/ehci-hcd.cfg >>>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/ehci-hcd/ehci-hcd.scc >>>>>> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/host/base.cfg >>>>>> create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/host/base.scc >>>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/xhci-hcd/xhci-hcd.cfg >>>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/usb/xhci-hcd/xhci-hcd.scc >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto