On 07/30/2012 10:21 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-07-30 08:11, Jim Abernathy wrote:
On 07/30/2012 09:56 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-07-30 07:48, Jim Abernathy wrote:
On 07/30/2012 09:15 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-07-30 06:53, Jim Abernathy wrote:
I'm on master branch trying to build core-image-minimal for the machine "pandaboard". Besides the basics, I put in a license statement for cloud9 into local.conf.

My bblayer.conf is as follows:

# LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time build/conf/bblayers.conf
# changes incompatibly
LCONF_VERSION = "5"

BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}"
BBFILES ?= ""

BBLAYERS ?= " \
   /home/jim/poky/meta \
   /home/jim/poky/meta-yocto \
   /home/jim/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \
   /home/jim/meta-ti \
   "

The error I'm getting is:

ERROR: ParseError at /home/jim/meta-ti/recipes-misc/payload/bonescript.bb:5: Could not inherit file classes/systemd.bbclass

Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = "1.15.3"
TARGET_ARCH       = "arm"
TARGET_OS         = "linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE           = "pandaboard"
DISTRO            = "poky"
DISTRO_VERSION    = "1.2+snapshot-20120730"
TUNE_FEATURES     = "armv7a vfp neon cortexa9"
TARGET_FPU        = "vfp-neon"
meta
meta-yocto = "master:7411158e1f980cd71c432026fa2f68ab80e3541e" meta-oe = "master:9afc488a1b97bfc5378f139ba04a7a5297b15fdb" meta-ti = "master:9bc77dff5f84578e259f8225bfa0656d94a2a60a"

ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'pseudo-native'

Try adding this in local.conf:
  BBMASK ?= ".*/meta-ti/recipes-(misc|bsp/formfactor)/"

BBMASK by itself didn't solve my particular problem. I'll try the other suggestions and report back.

What other problem do you have?  That BBMASK should keep bitbake from
trying to parse the recipe mentioned above.

Note: I use these layers with Yocto all the time with that mask...


When I just used the statement:

BBMASK ?= ".*/meta-ti/recipes-(misc|bsp/formfactor)/"

I got the same error as my original post.

The only way you could get that same error is if you already have a BBMASK statement somewhere and this one is being ignored because of the ?= assignment.

hmm..

right now I have the build running by using the BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "yes" statement.

When that is done, I'll test the BBMASK on a completely new build from scratch and see what I get.

Jim A

_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to