On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:49 AM, David Nyström <david.nyst...@enea.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, it looks like this was merged to the denzil branch, and >>>> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-headers-nativesdk was moved back to >>>> distro.conf. >>>> Any reason for this ? >>> >>> why do you want nativesdk headers to come from BSP its a fsl-ppc bsp I >>> dont expect it to have something special for SDK hosts which are >>> usually x86 ? afterall these are for >>> the SDK host and not for target. Moreover it means that this BSP will >>> not play in the multi BSP environment something you never want. >> >> But, I think we might need them for this warning specifically: >> >> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies >> NOTE: multiple providers are available for lib32-linux-libc-headers >> (lib32-linux-libc-headers, lib32-linux-libc-headers-yocto, >> lib32-linux-qoriq-sdk-headers) >> NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match >> lib32-linux-libc-headers >> NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime >> lib32-linux-libc-headers-dev (lib32-linux-libc-headers, >> lib32-linux-libc-headers-yocto, lib32-linux-qoriq-sdk-headers) >> NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match >> lib32-linux-libc-headers-dev >> > > This is a bug in OE-Core, it should have added appropriate defines for > multilib case as well in > tcmode-default.inc and default-providers.inc
And there appears to be a fix for it already: http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/34723/ -M > >> ? >> >> -M > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
