On 08/14/2012 09:26 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:49 AM, David Nyström <david.nyst...@enea.com> wrote:
Hi, it looks like this was merged to the denzil branch, and
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-headers-nativesdk was moved back to
distro.conf.
Any reason for this ?
why do you want nativesdk headers to come from BSP its a fsl-ppc bsp I
dont expect it to have something special for SDK hosts which are
usually x86 ? afterall these are for
the SDK host and not for target. Moreover it means that this BSP will
not play in the multi BSP environment something you never want.
My main concern is that meta-toolchain uses linux-libc-headers-nativesdk
for the meta-toolchain
tarball build, i.e. the meta-toolchain API may differ from the on-target
API in regards to kernel-headers, no ?
This might very well be true if kernel version of
linux-libc-headers-nativesdk != linux-libc-headers
Br,
David
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
