On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk> wrote:
> On 8 September 2013 11:24, Philipp Wagner <li...@philipp-wagner.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > a general question to start: 3.11.0 is out now as well (and it works, at > > least in my tests), should we add that as well? > > > > I think 3.10 would be a better choice first, as Greg Kroah-Hartman has > indicated that this will be the next Long-Term Support kernel > (http://www.kroah.com/log/blog/2013/08/04/longterm-kernel-3-dot-10/) > and oe-core also has a 3.10 series linux-yocto kernel. I threw in a > recipe for 3.8 as it's what I was playing with at the time and it > matches with oe-core also having a 3.8 series kernel. > > So the main idea that i would like to have it here would be: one stable version, and the last available one. But if people need and use more version, i don't mind to have all here available. > > Am 03.09.2013 14:26, Paul Barker wrote: > >> +PR = "r6" > > > > I guess this does not matter, but would r1 not be more natural? > > We can probably drop PR completely. > > +1 > >> +UDEV_GE_141 ?= "1" > > > > This is already part of linux.inc, is it necessary here again? > > I just copied the previous kernel recipe and made my changes. If this > is unnecessary here (which it looks to be), it'll also want removing > from the 3.6 and 3.2 recipes. > > +1 -- *Andrei Gherzan* m: +40.744.478.414 | f: +40.31.816.28.12
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto