On Monday 04 November 2013 13:54:24 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Sunday 03 November 2013 12:49:16 Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> > > > > wrote: > > > > (i can see it's going to be that kind of weekend.) ref manual reads: > > > > BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = "1" > > > > > > > > but some layers define: > > > > > > > > meta-linaro/meta-aarch64/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = > > > > "true" > > > > meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_W > > > > ARN > > > > ONLY = "true" > > > > meta-linaro/meta-linaro/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY = > > > > "true" > > > > poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev/conf/layer.conf:BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONL > > > > Y > > > > ?= "true" > > > > > > > > so general question(s) -- is it understood that "1" and "true" are > > > > equivalent? should there be a standard? should the ref manual be > > > > enhanced, or should the above layers clean themselves up? > > > > > > They are all correct. Accepted values are > > > > > > "1", "yes", "true" > > > > Note - for this variable only. For consistency with other "boolean" type > > variables I'd suggest sticking to "1". > > wait ... so those three synonyms are equivalent for only that one > variable? ewwwwwwwwww ...
That's the way it has been coded in this instance I'm afraid, yes. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto