On Monday 02 November 2015 21:55:01 Bryan Evenson wrote: > Martin, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 3:32 PM > > To: Bryan Evenson <beven...@melinkcorp.com> > > Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org > > Subject: Re: [yocto] COPY_LIC_DIRS, COPY_LIC_MANIFEST and firmware > > upgrades > > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:13:48PM +0000, Bryan Evenson wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > I'm on poky/dizzy-1.7.2 and I've been using COPY_LIC_DIRS and > > > > COPY_LIC_MANIFEST to include the license text on my image. I noticed > > something about the way it operates and I'm wondering if it's a problem > > when it comes to Free and Open Source Software compliance. > > > > > If I build an image with COPY_LIC_MANIFEST and COPY_LIC_DIRS both set > > > > to 1, then the image is generated with the directory /usr/share/common- > > licenses that include all the licenses for all the packages in the image. > > There is also /usr/share/common-licenses/license.manifest which > > summarizes all the licenses in the directory. Let's call this starting > > point image version A.> > > > Later on in development I add package "foo-extra" to the image. I add > > > > "foo-extra" to the RDEPENDS list for package "foo" which now needs the > > new package for proper operation. The built image now includes in > > /usr/share/common-licenses/foo-extra the license for the new package. > > We'll call this image version B. > > > > > If I ship a product that was burned with image verison A then it has all > > > the> > > licenses for all the packages that were installed in the image. Likewise, > > if I ship a product that was burned with image version B then it has all > > the licenses for all the packages that were installed in the image. > > However, if a product ships with image version A and then is upgraded to > > image version B then package "foo-extra" is installed due to dependencies > > but the license for "foo-extra" is not included in the upgrade. The > > /usr/share/common-licenses directory is not tied to any package, so > > firmware upgrade does not add, modify or remove any of the licenses in > > /usr/share/common-licenses.> > > > Is this a problem when it comes to FOSS compliance? If so, is there a > > > > suggested way of including the new licenses for firmware upgrades? > > > > You can also enable LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE which should create <pkg>- > > lic packages rrecommended from <pkg> so they should get installed together > > with image upgrade, see: > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743 > > Thanks for the information, I'll give this a try. I noticed I don't see any > reference to LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE in the Yocto documentation. Should I > add a bug in Bugzilla to add documentation for this variable?
Yes please. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto