Hello,
the demo package is the first package. I clear the list with PACKAGES = ""
They package should contain this files, this is not the problem.
The problem is the resulting package name. The name should be
rumo-cpp-demo-1.0rc... and not libscom1-1.0-rc...
Regards Simon
Am 22.12.2015 um 11:38 schrieb Ioan-Adrian Ratiu:
Hi
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:40:18 +0100
Simon Ruetzler <sruetz...@arigo-software.de> wrote:
Hello,
I want to create different packages from one recipe.
This is working except for one package.
I addes this package with
PACKAGES += " ${PN}-demo"
and I expected that it is named with the recipe name and demo. In this
case rumo-cpp-demo-1.0-rc...
But the name is libscom1-1.0-rc..
The demo package contains the files for a dynamic library: libscom.so,
libscom.so.1 and libscom.so.1.5.0
and this library name is automatically used for the package name.
For the other packages the name are as expected. All package are defined
in the same way except that FILES_.. definition is different.
This packages also have dynamic libs but only the libname.so.1 files and
the libname.so as a link.
Why is the demo package created with the libscom name? How can I disable
this?
Maybe the contents of ${PN}-demo get gobbled up by another package defined
before it in PACKAGES? The order of the contents of var PACKAGES matters:
it defines precedence, the first package to match a file includes it.
Try prepending to PACKAGES, something like this:
PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-demo "
Regards Simon
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
