On 01/13/2016 11:43 PM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have a small question about "exceptional" names of packages in yocto/OE. > Kernel package is being one example with the name "linux-yocto" vs. > traditional "linux_kernel".
Since you ask about "Yocto" naming in the Poky distribution I have the following comments: The Reference to "Yocto" should only be in terms of the project. The Soures you refer to in support of the "Poky" distro. > > Are there more such yocto-specific packages (of course excluding FW and > other bsp-related packages)? A look over the package list didn't reveal any, > but I wanted to double check. The Yocto project should not have any specific packages. Its "Poky". In fact in the last OEDAME it was decided to rename the meta-yocto* layers to meta-poky*. I was hoping would have been changed by now. People are saying "Yocto linux" which is wrong. Its the Yocto Project which has a test distro named "Poky". Just ask Phil B. > > > > The reason I am asking is that in case when we try to determine the package > CVEs against the NVD database, in these particular exception cases, we > probably want to check not only "linux-yocto", but also "linux_kernel" open > package CVEs with regards to specified version to make sure we cover as much > as we can. There may be a need to have a mapping for upstream names to packages named within OE. They may not all be 1:1. Or in the case of someone outside the project runs this in there distro they can. regards, Armin > > > > Best Regards, > Elena. > > > > > > -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto