I'm not saying this is the exact interface we want to use, but a good
example of a log interface I found easy to integrate into Geronimo.
http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/docs/api/mx4j/log/Log.html
-dain
On Apr 6, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
Dain, can you give a pointer to some doco on own logging interface
that mx4j project did?
thanks,
adi
-----Original Message-----
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:31 PM
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: coding standard and logging
I would like to restate my suggestion that YOKO simply develop their
own logging interface like the mx4j project did. This makes it very
easy to adapt to any solution.
-dain
On Apr 6, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Nolan, Edell wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 April 2006 16:07
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: coding standard and logging
Lars Kühne wrote, On 4/5/2006 9:30 PM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Lars Kühne wrote, On 4/4/2006 4:05 PM:
Nolan, Edell wrote:
2) The last email for the logging - is below We could use the
LogUtils class from celtix which is using the
jdk1.5 logging.
I think there was strong opposition against JDK logging because
people love log4j. I think the consensus was to define our own
logger interface and inject that in ORB.init().
What are our target JDK versions again? Do we start w/ JDK14 or
JDK13? I am of the opinion that we use the vanilla
logger for JDK14
or, if we start w/ JDK13, log4j. In either case I do not see the
need for a specialized logger interface that's injected; I'm
interested in hearing opinion on this.
JDK 1.3 will be end-of-lifed by Sun this summer, so I
think we should
ignore it.
Re logging, where I work we use log4j on JDK 1.4. I think that is a
pretty common scenario, and using vanilla j.u.logging will not
integrate well with the rest of our apps. If you want to
support both
you either have to use some logger abstraction, and a logger
interface
is the best abstraction I can come up with.
Makes sense. What about slf4j?
Re minimum JDK: I would like to also bring JDK 1.5 into
the picture,
but maybe that should go into another thread.
Yes, if our minimum JDK is 1.4 then I assume that we would work
under JDK1.5; er, at least if you don't use Geronimo as an
example. :)
Regards,
Alan.
I seen on the geronimo dev list
"We already support JDK 1.5 except for CORBA. Because of
the CORBA
limitation Geronimo can't be certified on JDK 1.5, but if
you leave
CORBA disabled (and turn off the DayTrader sample application)
Geronimo should run fine on 1.5.
Thanks,
Aaron
"
My vote is to start with jdk1.5 and it seems geronimo already has
support for jdk1.5.
Edell.
