Sorry - I wasn't attempting to drive anything, just noting a "customer
requirement" from what might be a very important customer.
Andy Piper wrote:
At 01:53 31/05/2006, you wrote:
Here are the options that I think are on the table:
[X] Use slf4j/log4j
[ ] Define our own logging API that is a "lowest common denominator"
type API
[ ] Define our own logging API that is not an LCD type API
[ ] Use java.util.logging directly
FWIW I think that having harmony drive the requirements for this is a
little strange. Surely the user experience is more important? If that's
the case then having a geronimo server output log messages in two
different ways seems bound to cause confusion.
andy
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
