[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-65?page=all ]

Edell Nolan updated YOKO-65:
----------------------------

          Component/s: Idl2Wsdl
    Affects Version/s: 1.0-incubating-M1

> Generate wrapped doc style wsdl.
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YOKO-65
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-65
>             Project: Yoko - CORBA Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Idl2Wsdl
>    Affects Versions: 1.0-incubating-M1
>            Reporter: Matteo Vescovi
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: expected_WrappedDocStyle.wsdl, wrapped_doc_style.diff, 
> WrappedDocStyle.idl
>
>
> Change the wsdl that is being generated currently to match a wrapped doc 
> style wsdl.
> This doesn't make a difference with the corba binding but generally it s a 
> well accepted design.
> For eg: Let's say the idl has the following operation:
> string
>     greetMe(
>         in string return_message
>     );
> Then the types that get generated should be:
>             <element name="greetMe">
>                 <complexType>
>                     <sequence>
>                         <element name="return_message" type="string"/>
>                     </sequence>
>                 </complexType>
>             </element>
>             <element name="greetMeResult">
>                 <complexType>
>                     <sequence>
>                         <element name="return" type="string"/>
>                     </sequence>
>                 </complexType>
>             </element>
> What we currently generate is:
> <element name="greetMe" type="string"/> & <element name="greetMeResult"
> type="string"/> which is correct but by default we should wrap it up
> with a complex type.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to