On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What's wrong w/ milestone naming conventions?
I'm not a fan.
1.0-M1, 1.0-M2, 1.0-M3...
is really misleading, IMO, as they give a sense of it being ready
to go
1.0....
I'd prefer to use a stable (i.e., not automatically updated snapshot)
version to work with. Also I really like the milestone numbering and
don't think it implies being ready. It is just a milestone on a
journey.
BTW I also feel that yoko is quite close to being 1.0 complete... not
that you need to be for a milestone :)
-dain
