Ricardo Correia wrote: > Hi, > > I've received a bug report of ztest failing in the exact same place as > before, > except now it's failing with ENOTSUPP (errno 95) instead of EBUSY (errno 16). > It seems related to the Hot Spare work, just like before. > > Debugging output is in the forwarded message below. > > zfs-fuse-0.1.3 is using spa.c revision 1.15 and ztest.c revision 1.14 (line > numbers may be slightly different, though). > > By the way, is it ok to post these kind of problems here, or is it better to > use the bug database? What if I'm not sure if it's really a ZFS bug, as > opposed to a bug in the Linux port?
Yes, post any suspected bugs to this alias. If it turns out to be a real bug we can always open a bug. -Mark
