----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> 
> >> There is absolutely no sense in having slog devices larger than
> >> then main memory, because it will never be used, right?
> >> ZFS will rather flush the txg to disk than reading back from
> >> zil? So there is a guideline to have enough slog to hold about 10
> >> seconds of zil, but the absolute maximum value is the size of
> >> main memory. Is this correct?
> >
> > ZFS uses at most RAM/2 for ZIL
> 
> It is good to keep in mind that only small writes go to the dedicated
> slog. Large writes to to main store. A succession of that many small
> writes (to fill RAM/2) is highly unlikely. Also, that the zil is not
> read back unless the system is improperly shut down.

I thought all sync writes, meaning everything NFS and iSCSI, went into the slog 
- IIRC the docs says so.
 
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er 
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av 
idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og 
relevante synonymer på norsk.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to