2009/4/14 Fabio Tranchitella <kob...@kobold.it>: > I fully agree: our company is based on zope3 technology, and we have at > least three big deployments based on zope3 (yes, the application server) > using ZODB and PostgreSQL/storm. I do not know in the details what would it > mean to switch to the zope toolkit/repoze/whatever is fashionable today, > but I suppose it would be quite painful for us.
You don't need to switch to the Zope Toolkit, because you are already using it. Switching to BFG may or may not be painful, it depends on if you have code that is dependent on zope.app.publisher, otherwise no. If so you may want to help with the zope.pipeline proposal that probably will end up creating a publisher that is more zope.app.publication-like, but more modular and modern. That should not be a big pain. -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
