On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:50, Lennart Regebro wrote: > OK, so it is now clear from Stephans comments that thsi really is two > separate proposals, just mixed into one file because of Stephans > workload. I think we should properly split them up, because this > clearly made a lot of people confused, and I wonder if anybody that > read this proposal realized that this was two independent things. I > sure didn't.
I think it was a lack of communication, If section 3.1 (as it does now in my local copy) clearly states that packages are not required to live in the Common Repository, it is fine. > So, the idea is to have a website for listing Zope3 products with it's > certification. And another idea is to have a common repository, with > rules for that. One question is then what requirements to have on > repositories that join into the certification process. Same as on the > ZF repository? None at all? Something in the middle? I have not figured this out yet. :-) I think we need one implementation first, to see how it will work. For example, the CERTIFICATION.xml file should always live in the common repository or a even more secured place to ensure validity of the process. I think we will quickly figure out ways to do that, once we have done it once. I think a lot of code can be reused. I have started a package that aims at providing an implementation of the process independently from the svn.zope.org layout. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
