More... at ApacheCon Bernd and me also discussed about, what's with the tobago code base. Stuff like upload can be *unified* for all these three libs.
-Matthias On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moving to dev..... good idea > Well, not to be a pain about it, but the inability of some users to > use a released product like Tomahawk shouldn't be driving the > development decisions of a podling. sure! > The need to have a popup calendar looks like a perfect trial run of > merging the two code bases, and I'd hate to see someone go out and > reinvent the popup calendar "wheel" yet another time when we've > already got two or three of them. sure, popup cal. is just a *simple* example of that. We have a wiki for identifing some task. Feel free to add content. (see [1]). > Realistically, merging the two is probably going to be more a matter > of porting Tomahawk components over to Trinidad than the other way > around, I'm guessing, so maybe I'm arguing over semantics. Yeah, sorta. The Trinidad podling for instance has already *buid-in*support for Facelets. Tomahawk has also some goodies. This task (merging) won't be a short one (IMO) -Matt [1] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/Identify_components_to_merge_into_Tomahawk_Shared > On 7/7/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Mike, > > > > yes that is the goal. but for some reasons user's won't / can't use > > Tomahawk (or MyFaces) in their production. I think that was the reason > > for this thread. Creating a custom one on top of the Trinidad Podling > > is ok for me. For the tomahawk stuff, we should take a look at Dojo > > ([1]). On the ApacheCon I saw that they have now "xml namespaces", > > means <dojo:wiget ... /> instead of *hacking* JS. > > > > I know some projects, that are not allowed to use MyFaces; they stick > > with IBM or the RI. > > > > -Matthias > > > > [1] http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html > > > > On 7/7/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Could someone refresh my memory? Was the eventual goal to merge > > > Trinidad and Tomahawk? > > > > > > If so, I think creating Yet Another Popup Calendar rather than making > > > the existing tomahawk popup calendars play nice with Trinidad is a > > > step in the wrong direction. > > > > > > However, I could be off-base on the eventual goal for these two libraries. > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It would definitely be of interest! (IMO, it would need to > > > > handle internationalization and localization - I'd like to keep Trinidad > > > > consistent in this regard.) > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Just a quick prompt to see if there is interest in such a feature. We may > > > > > have capacity to contribute. I see this being rendered in 'inaccessible' > > > > > mode only, perhaps instead of the window'ed calendar - thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ernst. We're really trying not to stray from Trinidad as a core > > > > > > library. However, I do like the look of the Tomahawk version, so that > > > > > would > > > > > > make a very good start. I guess I'm looking for guidance as to where > > > > > this > > > > > > would fit and how it would be configured - and indeed if people think > > > > > > Trinidad needs one! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Ernst Fastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a calendar with a JS-Popup mode in the tomahawk-component > > > > > > > library. > > > > > > > Take a look at: > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at/myfaces/calendar.jsf > > > > > > > Maybe you can use this one, or at least if you want to implement > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > similar in trinidad learn from this one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Dan Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Would there be interest in a 3rd calendar mode whereby it popsup a > > > > > > > > JavaScript calendar, rather than just the inline and windowed > > > > > > > versions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, is there one out there that people would like to see as the > > > > > > > basis on > > > > > > > > which to build? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > futher stuff: > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf futher stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Matthias Wessendorf futher stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
