Hi, I'm now sorry that we didn't schedule an AQM meeting slot in Buenos
Aires. We can certainly pre-load an agenda for Berlin with these topics
though. That is a long way in the future, however, so please use the
mailing list to discuss tests and metrics, share results, advertise
papers, etc, in the meantime on these topics!
On 2/26/2016 6:23 AM, De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE) wrote:
Hi Wes,
Just to let you know that we are still working on AQMs that support scalable
(L4S) TCPs.
We could present some of our latest results (if there will be a meeting in
Buenos Aires, otherwise in Berlin?)
* Performance of HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming (HAS) with different TCP's and
AQMs
o HAS is currently ~30% of Internet traffic, but no AQM testing so far has
included it
o the results are very poor with a particular popular AQM
Presenter: Inton Tsang
Duration: 10mins
Draft: Comparative testing of draft-ietf-aqm-pie-01,
draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-04, draft-briscoe-aqm-dualq-coupled
For experiment write-up, see Section 3 of
https://riteproject.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/rite-deliverable-3-3-public1.pdf
* PI^2: PI simplified with a square
o PIE embeds some auto-tuning and heuristics, which can be removed by
simple transformation of a variable
o Allows PIE to control also scalable congestion controls (DCTCP, ...)
Presenter: Koen De Schepper
Duration: 15mins
Draft: (probably impacted) draft-ietf-aqm-pie
* DualQ update
o extensive additional tests, including different RTTs and mixed RTTs,
better visualization
o using other AQMs than Curvy-RED for 'Classic' traffic, e.g. PI^2
Presenter: Koen De Schepper
Duration: 20min
Draft: draft-briscoe-aqm-dualq-coupled-01
Regards,
Koen.
-----Original Message-----
From: aqm [mailto:aqm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wesley Eddy
Sent: woensdag 10 februari 2016 20:27
To: aqm@ietf.org
Subject: [aqm] AQM plans
Hello AQMers, this is just a quick note to be clear on working group
status and forward planning.
Currently, all of the active drafts are either in WGLC, or in the
process of shepherd writeups to go the the AD.
Once we get the current set of drafts out for publication, there are a
few things the WG can do:
- close down
- remain open to continue coordinating and advance algorithms (e.g.
within the standards track)
- remain open as a venue for potential new work (e.g. the DualQ Coupled
AQM)
I think we should discuss this and plan to make a decision after the
IETF 96 meeting in Berlin (July 17-22). We can have a "closing or
re-chartering" meeting in Berlin if it will benefit from face-to-face
discussion.
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
