so you're either testing it wrong or it's been broken since that
worked fine years ago

you may try adding the "." after then extension ... I don't remember
maybe it's needed

eg:
exten => 1004000.,...

but better yet

exten => 100400XXXXXX,...

Martin


On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Vieri <rentor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> With overlapdial=yes set, when an Alcatel extension calls Asterisk, the 
> Alcatel user doesn't even have time to dial the second digit because Asterisk 
> connects it immediately instead of waiting for the rest of the digits.
>
> In Asterisk I have an incoming context [from-alcatel] with patterns such as:
> exten => 1004000,...
> exten => 1004001,...
> exten => 1004002,...
> exten => 1004053,...
> etc.
>
> Supposedly, Alcatel is doing "overlapdial", just like Asterisk.
> However, Asterisk only grabs the first digit and tries to match '1004' 
> instead of '1004053'.
>
> Thanks anyway.
>
> --- On Fri, 10/30/09, Martin <asteriskl...@callthem.info> wrote:
>
>> it's not only for dialing in ...
>>
>> setup an extension that is shorter than the number ... and
>> also without the "."
>>
>> eg
>>
>> exten => 1000,1,Dial()
>>
>> also when you call out using the overlapdial circuit you
>> do
>>
>> dial(zap/g1/) or dial(zap/g1/10)
>>
>> and the rest of the digits should come over overlapdial
>> ...
>> at least that's how it was designed to work
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Vieri <rentor...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I forgot to mention that I already have
>> overlapdial=yes in zapata.conf. Besides,  overlapdial=yes
>> is only for "dialing out" from Asterisk. Anyway, that option
>> is set.
>> >
>> > Any other ideas?
>> >
>> > --- On Fri, 10/30/09, Martin <asteriskl...@callthem.info>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> overlapdial=yes in
>> >> zapata.conf/chan_dahdi.conf
>> >> google it out
>> >>
>> >> Martin
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Vieri <rentor...@yahoo.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I have a PRI euroisdn link between an Alcatel
>> PBX and
>> >> Asterisk.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm having some trouble with overlap
>> dialing.
>> >> >
>> >> > Suppose I dial '874053' from an Alcatel
>> extension
>> >> ('7034') where '87' is an Alcatel prefix of type
>> "ARS
>> >> Prof.Trg Grp Seiz.with overlap".
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm expecting Asterisk to receive '1004053'
>> (where
>> >> '100' is a prefix which always shows up in the
>> euroisdn
>> >> setup).
>> >> >
>> >> > However, Asterisk is only receiving '1004'
>> which means
>> >> that it's not reading the digits that follow.
>> >> >
>> >> > Are there issues with "receiving" overlap
>> dials from
>> >> zap channels?
>> >> >
>> >> > According to the Alcatel trace below, it
>> looks like
>> >> Asterisk is accepting the call before a "Sending
>> complete"
>> >> is released by Alcatel.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm using libpri 1.2.8 and Asterisk
>> 1.2.31.1.
>> >> >
>> >> > Alcatel trace:
>> >> >
>> >> >> t3
>> >> > --> Cleaning mtracer...
>> >> > --> Positionning t3 filters...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> +--------+-------+--------+--------+---------+---------+----------+------+
>> >> > | filter | desti | src_id | cr_nbr | cpl_nbr
>> | us_term
>> >> | term_nbr | type |
>> >> >
>> >>
>> +--------+-------+--------+--------+---------+---------+----------+------+
>> >> > |    0   |   **  |   **   |   *
>>  |    **
>> >>   |    *    |    ***   |  165 |
>> >> > |    1   |   **  |   **   |   *
>>  |    **
>> >>   |    *    |    ***   |  166 |
>> >> > |    2   |   **  |   **   |   *
>>  |    **
>> >>   |    *    |    ***   |  167 |
>> >> > |    3   |       |        |
>>    |
>> >>       |         |          |
>>  |
>> >> > |    4   |       |        |
>>    |
>> >>       |         |          |
>>  |
>> >> > |    5   |       |        |
>>    |
>> >>       |         |          |
>>  |
>> >> > |    6   |       |        |
>>    |
>> >>       |         |          |
>>  |
>> >> > |    7   |       |        |
>>    |
>> >>       |         |          |
>>  |
>> >> >
>> >>
>> +--------+-------+--------+--------+---------+---------+----------+------+
>> >> > Traces Analyser activated
>> >> >
>> >> > mtracer started ...
>> >> > (476142:000001) MTRACER ♠©, version:
>> >> R9.0-h1.301-31-d-es-c7s2
>> >> > (476142:000001) MTRACER num: 007, time:
>> 2009/10/30
>> >> 11:53:02, loss: 0%
>> >> >
>> >>
>>  ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > | (476157:000002) 1095: Send_IO1
>> (link-nbr=19, sapi=0,
>> >> tei=0) :
>> >> > | long: 51  desti: 0  source: 15  cryst: 0
>>  cpl:
>> >> 19  us: 8  term: 0  type a5
>> >> > | tei: 0  <<<<  message sent :
>> SETUP
>> >> [05]    Call ref :  32 a8
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > |
>> >> > | IE:[04] BEARER_CAPABILITY (l=3) 80 90 a3
>> >> > | IE:[18] CHANNEL (l=3)  a9 83 9b -> T2 :
>> B
>> >> channel 27 exclusive
>> >> > | IE:[1e] PROGRESS_ID (l=2) 80 83
>> >> > | IE:[6c] CALLING_NUMBER (l=6)  ->  00
>>  81  Num
>> >> : 7034
>> >> > | IE:[70] CALLED_NUMBER (l=5)  ->  80
>>  Num :
>> >> 1004
>> >> > | IE:[7d] HLC (l=2) 91 81
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>  ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > | (476157:000003) Concatenated-Physical-Event
>> :
>> >> > | long: 24  desti: 0  source: 0  cryst: 0
>>  cpl: 19
>> >>  us: 0  term: 0  type a5
>> >> > | tei: 0  >>>>  message
>> received : CALL
>> >> PROC (02)  Call ref :  b2 a8
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > |
>> >> > | IE:[18] CHANNEL (l=4)  e9 81 83 9b
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>  ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > | (476157:000004) Concatenated-Physical-Event
>> :
>> >> > | long: 28  desti: 0  source: 0  cryst: 0
>>  cpl: 19
>> >>  us: 0  term: 0  type a5
>> >> > | tei: 0  >>>>  message
>> received :
>> >> CONNECT (07)  Call ref :  b2 a8
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > |
>> >> > | IE:[18] CHANNEL (l=4)  e9 81 83 9b
>> >> > | IE:[1e] PROGRESS_ID (l=2) 81 82
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>  ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > | (476158:000005) 1095: Send_IO1
>> (link-nbr=19, sapi=0,
>> >> tei=0) :
>> >> > | long: 23  desti: 0  source: 15  cryst: 0
>>  cpl:
>> >> 19  us: 8  term: 0  type a5
>> >> > | tei: 0  <<<<  message sent :
>> CONNECT
>> >> ACK (0f)  Call ref :  32 a8
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > |
>> >> > | IE:[18] CHANNEL (l=3)  a9 83 9b -> T2 :
>> B
>> >> channel 27 exclusive
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > In Asterisk I see:
>> >> >
>> >> > Oct 30 11:48:02 VERBOSE[11329] logger.c:
>>   --
>> >> Accepting call from '7034' to '1004' on channel
>> 1/27, span
>> >> 1
>> >> >
>> >> > If I change the Alcatel 87 prefix to use "ARS
>> Prof.Trg
>> >> Grp Seizure" (without overlap) then I get the
>> following
>> >> trace:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>  ______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > | (488410:000060) 1093: Send_IO1
>> (link-nbr=19, sapi=0,
>> >> tei=0) :
>> >> > | long: 55  desti: 0  source: 15  cryst: 0
>>  cpl:
>> >> 19  us: 8  term: 0  type a5
>> >> > | tei: 0  <<<<  message sent :
>> SETUP
>> >> [05]    Call ref :  33 52
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> > |
>> >> > | IE:[04] BEARER_CAPABILITY (l=3) 80 90 a3
>> >> > | IE:[18] CHANNEL (l=3)  a9 83 8a -> T2 :
>> B
>> >> channel 10 exclusive
>> >> > | IE:[1e] PROGRESS_ID (l=2) 80 83
>> >> > | IE:[6c] CALLING_NUMBER (l=6)  ->  00
>>  81  Num
>> >> : 7034
>> >> > | IE:[70] CALLED_NUMBER (l=8)  ->  80
>>  Num :
>> >> 1004053
>> >> > | IE:[7d] HLC (l=2) 91 81
>> >> > | [a1] Sending complete
>> >> >
>> >>
>> |______________________________________________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> > This time Asterisk gets what I expect but I
>> prefer to
>> >> use overlap dialing.
>> >> >
>> >> > Are there known issues with this?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Vieri
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> >> >
>> >> > asterisk-users mailing list
>> >> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> >> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> >>
>> >> asterisk-users mailing list
>> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> >>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> >
>> > asterisk-users mailing list
>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to